Today, there are a plethora of tools available to facilitate
interaction amongst students.
Individuals equipped with these tools have the ability to communicate
with others globally for leisure and/or work.
Siemens stated that, “people who traditionally found face to face
communication was primary are starting to realize that they can have really
meaningful relationships through online media” (Laureate Education, 2008). The methods in which individuals utilize to
communicate have advanced from the archaic methods of the past such as the
telegraph and stage coach. Stevens (2009) reflected on how collaboration in
virtual classrooms makes geography a non factor. Blogs, Facebook, Twitter, and Skype offer
different methods for learners to collaborate face to face in a virtual world
setting.
According to Siemens (2008), in order for distance education
to evolve, attention must be given to the importance of technology. Distance education will continue to thrive as
new ways of collaborating and communicating are developed. According to Morris (2010), global diversity
seemed virtually unheard of years ago.
Not many institutions offered these services due to the fact that
implementation expenses were pricey. In
traditional face-to-face teaching principles and pedagogy, communication is
limited to other participants who are present in the room with you. Distance education participants have the
ability to collaborate and communicate with others around the globe
synchronously (Laureate Education, 2008).
Furthermore, collaborating in distance education allows individuals to
communicate outside of their normal parameters and on an independent level.
References:
Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Siemens, George: The Future
of Distance Education. Principles of distance education. Baltimore,
MD: Author.